Skip to content

How the guide earns trust

Editorial standards

Useful local coverage requires independence, context, verification, and the nerve to explain tradeoffs clearly.

Independent judgment

Coverage, inclusion, and scores are editorial decisions. Payment, advertising, a free item, or a submission never guarantees a story or a favorable result. Any meaningful complimentary access or material relationship should be disclosed in the coverage.

Firsthand, specific reporting

Reviews should identify what was experienced, when it happened, what it cost, who it suits, and what could be better. Facts such as names, dates, addresses, prices, and event status should be checked before publication.

Scores with context

The 0–10 score is an editorial shorthand, not a crowd average or scientific measurement. The written review matters more. Scores should reflect the experience described and may be revisited only when the underlying experience materially changes.

Clear labels and boundaries

Sponsored work, affiliate relationships, and commercial collaborations should be labeled plainly. Advertising partners do not receive advance approval of independent editorial conclusions. Opinion, reported fact, and quoted claims should remain distinguishable.

Corrections and updates

Material errors should be corrected promptly and transparently. Routine changes such as hours or ticket availability may be updated without a formal note; changes that alter the meaning or conclusion should carry an update or correction note.

Read the corrections process →